⚠ Reserve Life Averages Away the ProblemLow threat

Barrick Mining (B) — threat to the moat

A company-wide reserve life is a mean across mines that will not run out together, and it says nothing about which jurisdiction the years are sitting in.

A reserve life of several decades is a comforting number and it is an average. Averages conceal distributions, and in mining the distribution is what matters.

Share of 2026 gold production guidance, by regionNorth America — 61%Africa and Middle East — 30%South America & Asia Pacific — 9%Barrick Q2 2026 MD&A, 2026 guidance by operation; midpoints
A company-wide reserve life hides that almost a third of output is in Africa.

Barrick's reserve life is calculated across a portfolio in which some mines have thirty years ahead of them and others have five. The five-year mines still carry full workforces, full communities, full closure obligations and full fixed costs, and when they end, the production has to be replaced immediately regardless of what the company-wide average says. A portfolio with a long mean can still face a cliff in a given year at a given operation.

The second thing an average hides is location. Reserve life concentrated in one favourable jurisdiction is worth more than the same number spread across countries where the licence is a political instrument, and Mali demonstrated that a reserve can go to zero for reasons the geology knows nothing about1.

The genuine strength is that Barrick's long-life assets are also its biggest ones, so the mean is not being propped up by small mines with long tails. That is the right way round.

The number to watch is reserve life at the flagship operations individually, and the share of total reserves sitting in jurisdictions with enforceable title. The company-wide average is the least informative version of this statistic.

References
  1. ReportedBarrick's geopolitical difficulty centred on Mali, where a reserve's value can fall to zero for reasons unrelated to geology.
    Gold-miner peer comparison, 2025 results and 2026 guidance — Newmont led global production with 5.89 million attributable ounces in 2025; Agnico Eagle secured the number two global position with payable gold production of 3.447 million ounces, exceeding Barrick's 3.26 million ounces by nearly 200,000; Barrick's all-in sustaining costs rose 10% year on year to $1,637 per ounce in 2025 and are guided to $1,760-$1,950 for 2026, with cash costs of $1,330-$1,470 against $1,199 in 2025, while Agnico guided 2026 AISC of $1,400-$1,550 per ounce; Agnico trades at a forward twelve-month earnings multiple of about 11.5x, roughly 21.7% above the industry average of 9.48x; AngloGold and Agnico Eagle separated themselves from the pack through superior cost control and jurisdiction management while Barrick struggled with geopolitical friction, notably the dispute with Mali's authorities over the Loulo-Gounkoto complex — FY2025 / 2026 guidance · publ. 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026