✦ Reko Diq & the Security ProblemThin moat

Barrick Mining (B) — the future bets

A generational deposit in one of the world's hardest places — the 2028 target now sits behind a review, which is jurisdiction risk in its purest form.

Reko Diq is the biggest thing Barrick owns that it does not yet mine: a copper-gold deposit in Balochistan, held 50% by Barrick with Pakistani federal and provincial interests holding the rest, designed for a first phase of about 240,000 tonnes of copper and 297,000 ounces of gold a year, rising in a second phase toward 460,000 tonnes and 520,000 ounces1. On geology alone it is a generational asset.

A generational deposit, on holdPhase 1 designed· 240kt Cu+ 297koz Au/yr2028 firstproductiontargetedFeb 2026· developmentslowed on securityReview extendedto mid-2027Barrick holds 50%; capital budget and timeline increases flagged in the Q2 2026 MD&A
The geology is world-class and the geography is the problem — which is jurisdiction risk in its purest form, since a miner cannot choose where the ore is.

On geography it is the reason this page is rated the way it is. In February 2026, citing escalating security risks and an increase in security incidents, Barrick slowed development, reduced capital spending and extended its technical and financing review to mid-2027 — while flagging potential significant increases to the previously disclosed capital budget and timeline2. The 2028 first-production target, reiterated for years, now sits behind a review rather than a schedule.

This is the jurisdiction risk that runs through Barrick's whole story, in its most concentrated form — the same risk that produced the Mali seizure and the retrospective mining-code payments that followed. A miner does not choose where the ore is, which is precisely why political risk is not diversifiable for this industry. Watch what the mid-2027 review concludes: a restated capital budget and a credible date would make Reko Diq a decade-defining asset. Continued deferral, or a write-down, would confirm that the world's best undeveloped copper deposits are mostly in the world's hardest places for a reason.

The number that tests this moat
Reported
Reko Diq 2026 capital expenditure guidance, Barrick's share
$450-500 million, reduced during the review

Development was slowed in February 2026 on security risks and the project review now runs to mid-2027. Spending that keeps falling says the project is being deferred; a budget increase after the review would show how much the security problem cost.

Source: Barrick Q2 2026 MD&A ↗
References
  1. ReportedBarrick holds 50%; Phase 1 targets ~240,000t of copper and ~297,000oz of gold a year, Phase 2 ~460,000t and ~520,000oz.
    Barrick — Reko Diq update: Barrick holds 50% (Pakistani federal and Balochistan interests hold the balance); Phase 1 designed for ~240,000t of copper and ~297,000oz of gold a year, Phase 2 rising toward ~460,000t and ~520,000oz; development slowed in February 2026 on escalating security risks with the project review extended to mid-2027 — 2026 · publ. 2026 · source ↗
  2. ReportedDevelopment was slowed in February 2026 on escalating security risks, the review extended to mid-2027, with potential significant increases to capital budget and timeline flagged.
    Barrick Q2 2026 MD&A (SEC Form 6-K exhibit) — Reko Diq development slowed with reduced capital expenditure and the project review extended, flagging potential significant increases to the capital budget and timeline; Lumwana Super Pit spend profile; Fourmile to be incorporated into the NGM joint venture; planned IPO of the North American gold assets — Q2 2026 · publ. August 10, 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026