The Detroit Retreat: Fifty-Three Billion in Write-DownsNarrow moat

Tesla (TSLA) — moat facet

The policy rollback that cleared Tesla's American competition is the same one that destroyed its regulatory-credit revenue — one change, both effects.

The traditional American automakers have pulled back hard from the electric vehicle programmes they announced with such confidence, and the cost is now on the record. Ford took $19.5 billion of electric-vehicle charges; General Motors booked $7.6 billion for 2025 and said more were likely in 2026; and Stellantis wrote off €22.2 billion, about $26.2 billion1. Together that is more than $53 billion2. Nor is Ford's electric unit profitable yet: it expects Model e to lose $4.0 to $4.5 billion before interest and tax in 2026, an improvement on the $4.8 billion it lost in 20253.

EV charges booked by US-market rivals ($B)Stellantis$26.2BFord$19.5BGeneral Motors, 2025$7.6BAxios (Feb 2026); Stellantis wrote off €22.2B. Ford guides a 2026 Model e loss of $4.0-4.5B
Three incumbents booked more than $53B of charges between them: relief for Tesla that its own sales did not earn.

On the face of it this is unambiguously good for Tesla: the competitors who were supposed to erode its American position have pulled back from the field, and the domestic market is less contested than anyone expected two years ago.

The catch is that both events have the same cause. Detroit retreated in large part because emissions and fuel-economy standards were rolled back — and those same standards were what compelled rivals to buy regulatory credits from Tesla. One policy change simultaneously removed Tesla's American competition and shrank a revenue line that was almost pure profit, examined on the Major Clients pages. Tesla did not choose that trade.

Watch American electric vehicle share against total American vehicle sales. If the whole category stops growing because the policy that created it is gone, winning a larger share of it is a smaller prize than it looks.

Moat trajectory: Widening

American competition genuinely weakened: Stellantis wrote off $26.2B, Ford took $19.5B and expects a further $4.0-4.5B Model e loss in 2026, and GM booked $7.6B for 2025 with more likely — over $53B between them. Widening from Tesla's side, with the qualification that deregulation granted it, that the same change shrank Tesla's credit revenue, and that a policy gift can be withdrawn.

The number that tests this moat
Moat Explorer calc
Combined Detroit EV write-downs
About $53B: Stellantis $26.2B, Ford $19.5B, GM $7.6B

Ford also expects a Model e loss of $4.0-4.5B in 2026, and GM said more charges were likely. Genuine competitive relief — granted by the same deregulation that shrank Tesla's credit revenue. Watch American EV share against total vehicle sales: a larger share of a shrinking category is a smaller prize.

How it's calculated: Sum of the EV charges Axios reported for Stellantis ($26.2B), Ford ($19.5B) and GM ($7.6B).
Source: Axios (Feb 2026); electrive (Apr 2026) ↗
References
  1. ReportedFord took $19.5 billion of EV charges; GM booked $7.6 billion for 2025 and said more were likely in 2026; Stellantis wrote off €22.2 billion, about $26.2 billion.
    Axios — Stellantis €22.2B ($26.2B) of EV-related charges; GM $7.6B of charges for 2025 with more likely in 2026; Ford $19.5B — 2025-2026 · publ. Feb 6, 2026 · source ↗
  2. Moat Explorer calcTogether that is more than $53 billion.
    Moat Explorer calc — Stellantis $26.2B + Ford $19.5B + GM $7.6B (Axios, Feb 2026) = $53.3B of EV charges — 2025-2026 · publ. Sept 2026 · source ↗
    Method: Stellantis $26.2B + Ford $19.5B + GM $7.6B = $53.3B.
  3. ReportedFord expects a 2026 Model e EBIT loss of $4.0 to $4.5 billion, against $4.8 billion in 2025.
    electrive — Ford expects a full-year 2026 Model e EBIT loss of $4.0 to $4.5 billion, an improvement on its $4.8 billion loss in 2025 — 2025-2026 · publ. Apr 30, 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026