⚠ Fee Pressure and the Race to Lower CostsModerate threat

GPW (GPW) — threat to the moat

Regulators and rivals both push trading fees one way: down.

The diversified toll is not immune to erosion of the toll rate itself. Trading fees across the world's exchanges face steady downward pressure — from regulators seeking cheaper markets for investors, from competition with alternative venues that undercut on price, and from the largest members negotiating volume discounts. An exchange can find its volumes rising while the fee per trade falls, so the revenue does not grow as fast as the activity, and in some lines a race to lower costs steadily thins the margin on each transaction.

Equity trading revenue per 1bn zł of Main Market turnover (zl thousand)423202339920243852025377H1 2026Calculated from GPW Management Board report 2025 and GPW H1 2026 interim report
The effective toll per złoty traded has fallen 11% in two and a half years.

GPW is somewhat sheltered by its monopoly and its smaller, less hyper-competitive market than the global venues, but not immune: European pressure for cheaper, more competitive markets is a structural headwind, and the leakage of blue-chip flow to cheaper foreign venues is itself a form of fee competition. The recurring streams — listings, data — are stickier on price, which is part of why they matter. But the long-run global trend in exchange transaction fees is downward, and GPW rows against that current like everyone else, relying on volume growth and new products to more than offset a toll rate that rarely rises and often drifts down — 2025's record came from volumes, not fees1.

References
  1. Reported2025's record came from volumes, not fees.
    GPW FY2025 results (management board report) — record revenue 551,9m zł (+18,7%), adjusted EBITDA 225,4m zł (+37,7%), adjusted net profit 204,7m zł (+30,2%); dividend policy 60–80% of profit — FY2025 · publ. March 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 24, 2026