CompetitorsNarrow moat

Adyen (ADYEN) — moat facet

Share tables count merchants, which is the wrong measure for a company that deliberately serves very few of them.

Market-share tables make Adyen look like a minor participant: Stripe at roughly 34% and PayPal at about 32% of payment-management installations, against Adyen's 9%1. Those numbers count merchants, and counting merchants is the wrong way to measure a company that deliberately serves very few of them.

Payment-management installations (% share)34.1%Stripe31.7%PayPal9.2%AdyenCounts merchants, not volume — the wrong measure for a company that serves very few.
Share tables make Adyen look small because they count the thing it deliberately avoids.

Adyen's pricing explains the strategy. It sells interchange-plus from roughly 0.6% plus €0.11, against Stripe's headline 2.9% plus 30 cents; for most enterprises processing more than $250 million a year, Adyen is the lowest all-in cost. Below that threshold the economics do not work for either party, which is why Adyen has one-ninth of Stripe's merchant count and a comparable position among the largest ones.

The Stripe rivalry has its own root threat and is not restated here. What these pages add is that Adyen's four competitors are four different kinds of thing: a rival that won the developer market and is moving upmarket; a consumer brand that Adyen must support inside its own checkout rather than displace; a direct enterprise specialist competing for identical accounts; and the legacy acquirers whose merchants Adyen has spent fifteen years taking.

Watch net revenue rather than processed volume or merchant count. Volume grows with the merchants Adyen already has, and merchant count is the metric that makes the strategy look like weakness. Net revenue is where winning accounts shows up.

Moat trajectory: Holding steady

Nothing decisive moved. Stripe still owns the long tail and Adyen still owns the global enterprise, the two heading slowly toward the same middle. Checkout.com competes for identical accounts, PayPal remains a method Adyen must carry, and the legacy acquirers continue to lose merchants to platforms built rather than assembled. The competitive structure is the same as a year ago.

The number that tests this moat
Third-party estimate
Share of payment-management installations
~9%, against Stripe's ~34%

The wrong measure for a company that deliberately serves very few merchants: Adyen prices from roughly 0.6% plus EUR 0.11 and is the cheapest all-in option only above about $250M of annual volume. Watch net revenue rather than volume or merchant count — that is where winning accounts shows up.

Source: Third-party payments market share data ↗
Dig deeper
References
  1. Third-party estimateStripe holds ~34% of payment-management installations and PayPal ~32% against Adyen's ~9%; Adyen prices from ~0.6% + EUR 0.11 and is cheapest above about $250M of annual volume.
    Enterprise payment processing comparison, 2026 — Stripe holds roughly 34.07% of payment-management installations, PayPal about 31.66% and Adyen about 9.16%; Adyen prices on interchange-plus from around 0.6% plus EUR 0.11, Stripe at a default 2.9% plus 30 cents and Braintree at 2.59% plus 49 cents; for most enterprises processing more than $250 million annually Adyen is the lowest all-in cost; Stripe was built for developers, PayPal for consumers and Adyen for large enterprises, with Adyen winning the global omnichannel enterprise on a single financial stack rather than stitched-together acquirers, which is why it processes for merchants including Uber, Spotify, McDonald's and Microsoft; Checkout.com focuses on performance optimisation and international coverage, Worldpay provides extensive acquiring reach and enterprise solutions, and Braintree offers wallet integration within the PayPal ecosystem — 2026 · publ. 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026